 |
- one, evaluate existing of eHAC.
the Participant In this study, based on the User-Centered Design method at the Plan the Human-Centered Design stage, the involved participants have used the e-HAC application since they can provide more accurate input based on their experiences. Participants in this study consisted of 4 groups based on different age vulnerable groups. Each group has 4 - 5 vulnerable people of the same age. and for the Method of collecting data is Interview and Questionnaire.
- two, analysis of the evaluation result.
At this stage, the writer will conduct an analysis and see the results of the evaluation that has been done previously. The author identifies people who use the e-HAC application. This will explain what for and under what conditions they want to use this e-HAC application and in accordance with the User-Centered Design concept at the Specify the Context of Use stage.
We will evaluate it from the questionnaire results distributed to several respondents, which will be measured using SUS. A questionnaire contains questions about Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Satisfaction where we can see the results of each respondent's scores and calculate the average of the results of these scores so that we will get the results of the evaluation of the current e-HAC application. According to [16], If the results obtained are below 68, it can be concluded that the e-HAC application is still classified as bad and needs improvement.
|
IEEE/ICACT20220374 Slide.05
[Big Slide]
[YouTube]