IEEE/ICACT20240441 Slide.14        [Big Slide]       Oral Presentation
In this slide, a comparison of stability among different methods is shown in Figures. First, the proposed enhanced REV provides an error rate of about 2%. In the 1st paper, the conventional REV provides an error rate above 10%. In the 5th paper, the Fast REV provides an error rate of about 2%. In the 7th paper, the FPAC provides an error rate of about 4%. It shows the proposed enhanced REV provides stable beampattern performance.

[Go to Next Slide]
Select Voice: